SC Slams 'Unfortunate' Remarks: Notices to Sanjay Raut, Nikhil Wagle
The Supreme Court issues notices to Sanjay Raut and Nikhil Wagle over remarks against CJI Surya Kant. Read more on the contempt proceedings.
The Supreme Court has taken a stern view of comments made against the Chief Justice of India (CJI), issuing notices to Shiv Sena (UBT) Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Raut and journalist Nikhil Wagle. The court is acting on a criminal contempt petition filed by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) regarding remarks directed at CJI Surya Kant.
Court's Disappointment Over Criticisms
A bench comprising CJI Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi expressed deep disappointment over the nature of the comments. While the court has exempted both individuals from appearing in person for the time being, it has demanded an explanation as to why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them.
During the proceedings, CJI Kant highlighted a perceived irony in the behavior of those who criticize the judiciary. He noted that whenever personal liberties or fundamental rights are under threat, individuals frequently approach the court for rescue and protection.
“Probably the courts have never lagged behind in protecting those rights. And if the same people condemn, criticise, take the courts left and right, it is very unfortunate. Very, very unfortunate,” CJI Kant remarked.
The Chief Justice further added, “May better sense prevail. We can only pray.”
The Root of the Controversy
The legal battle began after the Supreme Court Bar Association filed the criminal contempt petition on October 15. The friction reportedly started when CJI Surya Kant declined a request from a delegation of Opposition parties who sought a meeting with him last week. Instead of a private meeting, the CJI had advised the delegation to follow legal protocol by filing a formal petition before the Supreme Court.
Legal Consent for Proceedings
The move toward criminal contempt proceedings has gained significant legal weight as Attorney General R Venkataramani has granted his consent to initiate the action under the Contempt of Courts Act.
The court now awaits the response from Sanjay Raut and Nikhil Wagle to determine the next course of action in this high-profile case.