Satya Niketan building collapse case: Court reserves order on bail plea of Hari Ram Gupta
Patiala House Court reserves order on Hari Ram Gupta's bail plea in the Satya Niketan building collapse case.
The Patiala House Court on Wednesday reserved its order regarding the bail application of Hari Ram Gupta, who was arrested in connection with the tragic Satya Niketan building collapse case. The decision comes after a hearing where both the prosecution and the defense presented arguments regarding the accused's health and age.
Medical grounds vs. Investigation stage
The legal proceedings centered on the health condition of the 82-year-old accused. Advocate Yashpal Singh, representing Gupta, argued that the senior citizen should be granted regular bail due to his advanced age and medical complications. The defense highlighted that Gupta, a retired Indian Air Force Sergeant, suffers from Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus and Gliptin-induced Bullous Pemphigoid, requiring consistent medication and steroids.
However, the Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the bail plea. Citing a medical report provided by jail authorities, the prosecution argued that Gupta's medical conditions do not require specialized treatment beyond what can be provided at the jail dispensary. The prosecution emphasized that the Satya Niketan building collapse case investigation is still in its early stages and a charge-sheet has not yet been filed.
Background of the tragedy
The case stems from a devastating incident on September 6, when a building in Satya Niketan collapsed, resulting in the deaths of seven people and leaving several others injured. One victim remains in critical condition. The investigation has scrutinized the role of the building owners, including Gupta, who is the husband of the owner, Urmila Gupta.
In a previous hearing on September 18, the court had dismissed Gupta's earlier bail attempt. At that time, Additional Sessions Judge SPS Laler noted several factors against granting bail, including:
- The severity of the tragedy and the number of casualties.
- The fact that the investigation is in its initial stages.
- Evidence suggesting the involvement of the accused in site work.
- Questions regarding the upkeep of the property despite it yielding substantial rent.
While the court had previously denied bail, it had instructed jail authorities to ensure that the accused receives all prescribed medicines without delay. The court is expected to pronounce its order on the current bail plea shortly.