Liquor Scam: Chhattisgarh HC Grants Bail to Ramgopal Agrawal
The Chhattisgarh High Court has granted bail to Ramgopal Agrawal in the alleged liquor scam case, citing parity and lack of specific overt acts.

The Chhattisgarh High Court has granted regular bail to Ramgopal Agrawal, who was embroiled in the high-profile Ramgopal Agrawal liquor scam investigation. Justice Bibhu Datta Guru presided over the matter, allowing the plea while imposing strict conditions to ensure the integrity of the ongoing legal process.
Court's Rationale for Granting Bail
While deciding on the application, the Court highlighted several key factors that favored the applicant. A primary observation was that Agrawal was not mentioned in the original First Information Report (FIR). Instead, his name surfaced later in a supplementary charge-sheet.
The Court noted that the case against him relied heavily on documentary evidence already in the possession of the investigating agency. Furthermore, it was observed that there were no pending recoveries to be made from him, and the FIR did not attribute any specific overt act to his conduct.
The Legal Arguments
Representing Agrawal, a legal team comprising Advocate Arshdeep Singh Khurana, Harsh Shrivastava, and Sajal K Gupta argued that their client was innocent and had been falsely implicated in the conspiracy.
A significant point raised during the hearings was the "principle of parity." The defense pointed out that several other co-accused individuals, including those identified as the principal accused in the scam, had already been granted either regular or anticipatory bail by the High Court and the Supreme Court.
Concerns Over Trial Duration
The High Court also took into account the sheer scale of the legal proceedings. Given that the trial involves a massive volume of documents and a large number of witnesses, the Court acknowledged that the process is likely to take a considerable amount of time. Agrawal has been in custody since July 17, 2026.
Prosecution's Stance and Court Conditions
The prosecution strongly opposed the bail plea, contending that Agrawal played a role in handling and channelising the proceeds generated from the alleged scam. Despite these objections, the Court allowed the bail but set forth the following mandates:
- Financial Bond: Agrawal must furnish a personal bond of ₹1 lakh, along with two local sureties of the same amount.
- Travel Restrictions: He is required to surrender his passport.
- Conduct: He must cooperate fully with the investigation and trial, and is strictly prohibited from threatening or influencing witnesses or committing any further offences.
Background of the Case
The legal battle stems from an FIR registered by the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) and the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) of Chhattisgarh. The investigation centers on alleged irregularities concerning the manufacture and sale of liquor within the state between the years 2019 and 2023.
Crucially, the High Court clarified that these observations were made solely for the purpose of deciding the bail application. The judge directed the trial court to operate independently and ensured that these remarks should not be viewed as an opinion on the ultimate merits of the case.