Pappu Yadav to File FIR Against Dhirendra Shastri Over Lord Krishna Remarks
MP Pappu Yadav seeks FIR and ₹100 crore damages against Baba Bageshwar over controversial remarks about Lord Krishna.
The political and spiritual landscape has ignited into a heated confrontation as Member of Parliament Pappu Yadav prepares to take legal action against the prominent spiritual leader Dhirendra Krishna Shastri, widely known as Baba Bageshwar. In a move that signals a major escalation, Yadav has announced his intention to file a formal complaint at the Parliament Street Police Station in Delhi today, seeking the registration of an FIR against the seer.
The Spark: Controversial Comparisons
The controversy traces back to a recent Shri Ram Katha program held in Karera, Madhya Pradesh. During the event, Dhirendra Shastri allegedly made remarks concerning Lord Krishna that have since sparked widespread outrage. Reports indicate that Shastri drew comparisons between the postures and names of Lord Ram and Lord Krishna.
While the spiritual leader may have intended a theological discussion, the comments were perceived very differently by listeners. The remarks triggered immediate protests from various saint organizations and members of the Yadav community, who viewed the comparison as an insult to their faith and a slight against the deity.
Pappu Yadav’s Fierce Reaction
MP Pappu Yadav has emerged as a leading voice against the spiritual leader, condemning the remarks in the strongest possible terms. Not minceing words, Yadav labeled Dhirendra Shastri a "fraud" and asserted that such comments cannot be overlooked.
Beyond the criminal complaint, Yadav is planning a massive legal battle. He has declared his intent to pursue a defamation lawsuit against Baba Bageshwar, seeking damages to the tune of ₹100 crore.
Baba Bageshwar’s Defense and Regret
As the backlash intensified, Dhirendra Shastri moved to contain the damage by issuing a formal clarification. Expressing regret over the turmoil caused, Shastri maintained that his words were misinterpreted and twisted out of context by critics.
In his defense, the spiritual leader asserted the following points:
- He categorically denied being "anti-Krishna."
- He argued that his devotion to the deity is unquestionable.
- He cited his active and public support for the Krishna Janmabhoomi movement as concrete evidence of his faith.
Despite these clarifications, the legal machinery is now in motion, with all eyes on the Delhi Police to see if an FIR will be registered based on Pappu Yadav's complaint.