LARA money laundering case: Delhi Court defers formal framing of charges, asks ED to take instructions
The Rouse Avenue court has deferred the formal framing of charges in the LARA projects money laundering case involving Lalu Prasad Yadav until October 30.

The Rouse Avenue court on Saturday deferred the formal framing of charges in the high-profile LARA projects money laundering case until October 30. The proceedings, which saw the appearance of Lalu Prasad Yadav, Rabri Devi, and Tejashwi Yadav, were put on hold as the court directed the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to take further instructions.
Court delays proceedings until October 30
Special Judge (MP-MLA cases) Prashant Kumar presided over the hearing, noting the need for the ED to seek instructions following directions passed by the predecessor court. The court had previously observed that the formal framing of charges would be finalized once the necessary administrative and legal instructions were obtained from the agency.
The accused, including members of the Lalu Prasad Yadav family, were scheduled to appear before the court on October 3 to sign the formal charges, but the matter has now been pushed to the end of the month.
Connection to the IRCTC tender scam
This money laundering investigation is intrinsically linked to the irregularities identified in the IRCTC hotel tender scam investigated by the CBI. The allegations suggest a complex web of transactions involving railway contracts and land parcels.
The case involves several key figures and entities, including:
- Lalu Prasad Yadav
- Rabri Devi
- Tejashwi Prasad Yadav
- P.C. Gupta and Sarala Gupta
- Sujata Hotels
- Vijay Kochhar and Vinay Kochhar
Allegations of 'unearned perks' and land deals
The investigation centers on allegations that during his tenure as the Union Minister for Railways, Lalu Prasad Yadav manipulated the tender process for IRCTC Hotels in Ranchi and Puri to favor specific bidders, namely Sujata Hotels.
According to the ED's findings, a quid pro quo arrangement was allegedly orchestrated where the directors of Sujata Hotels transferred prime land in Patna to a company called M/s DMCPL, controlled by associates P.C. Gupta and Sarala Gupta, at significantly undervalued rates. Subsequently, the shares of this company were allegedly sold at a pittance to Rabri Devi and Tejashwi Yadav, effectively transferring the value of the land to the family.
The judicial scrutiny
In earlier observations, the court had emphasized the need to determine whether the former Minister of Railways used his position to project "unearned perks" as untainted assets. The court noted that the ED's allegations, spanning from 2005 to 2014, suggest a deliberate manipulation of railway officials to award contracts in exchange for land assets, which the ED describes as the "proceeds of crime."
During the hearing on Saturday, advocate Manu Mishra appeared for the ED, while advocates Navin Kumar and Varun Jain represented the Lalu Prasad Yadav family.