Delhi HC Denies Interim Bail to Vikas Langarpuria
Delhi High Court refuses interim bail for Vikas Langarpuria, citing his criminal past and previous escape to UAE using a fake passport.
The Delhi High Court has rejected the plea for interim bail filed by Vikas Gulia, also known as Vikas Langarpuria, citing his extensive criminal history and his previous attempt to evade justice. A Division Bench comprising Justices Prathiba M Singh and Dinesh Bhat declined the request for a temporary suspension of his sentence.
Medical Grounds Rejected Due to Criminal Record
Langarpuria had approached the court seeking a six-week interim bail, primarily on the grounds that his mother required surgery. However, the court took a stern view of his background when evaluating the application. The bench noted that given the appellant's criminal antecedents, it was not inclined to grant any interim relief.
The Delhi Police had submitted a report verifying the medical documentation provided by the appellant. In their status report, the police mentioned that Langarpuria's wife and sister are available to provide care for his mother, suggesting that his presence was not an absolute necessity for her medical treatment.
A History of Flight and Fake Passports
The court's decision was heavily influenced by Langarpuria's past conduct regarding legal authorities. According to police reports, the accused had previously managed to flee the country to the UAE by using a fake passport while out on bail.
To prevent his escape, competent authorities had issued a Look-Out Circular (LOC) and a Red Corner Notice. His eventual apprehension was made possible through information received from the NCB in Abu Dhabi, after which he was deported back to India to face legal proceedings.
Details of Criminal Antecedents
The prosecution presented a detailed profile of Langarpuria, characterizing him as a hardened criminal. Key details from the police reports include:
- Multiple FIRs: The appellant has been linked to approximately 19 heinous cases involving registered FIRs.
- Recent Records: The latest nominal roll indicates eleven active FIRs, although he has received bail or discharge in some instances.
- Organised Crime Link: He was previously detained under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act in connection with a 2015 FIR from the Najafgarh Police Station.
The Additional Public Prosecutor, Ritesh Kumar Bahri, strongly opposed the bail application, highlighting that production warrants were issued following his apprehension to ensure his arrest in the current matter.
The matter is not entirely concluded, as the appellant's appeal against the judgment has been scheduled for a hearing on October 14.